<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catholic Democrats of Nebraska</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>I am a Dem.  I don't support abortion.  I don't support any killing.  So I'm anti-war, anti-weapons, anti-death penalty and anti-inequity of wealth that sends 1 out of every 4 children in the country to bed malnourished.  No, I'm not a communist.  But I do try to be a Christian.  The Christ wasn't a killer.  He attended to the poor.  He lived a life of poverty.  He warned us about wealth.  And He warned us about judging others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Dem.  I don&#8217;t support abortion.  I don&#8217;t support any killing.  So I&#8217;m anti-war, anti-weapons, anti-death penalty and anti-inequity of wealth that sends 1 out of every 4 children in the country to bed malnourished.  No, I&#8217;m not a communist.  But I do try to be a Christian.  The Christ wasn&#8217;t a killer.  He attended to the poor.  He lived a life of poverty.  He warned us about wealth.  And He warned us about judging others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>I also believe there is room for pro-life people in the Democratic party, precisely because they are consistent with their pro-life position; being against the death penalty as well, and generally in favor of better educational systems,  wanting to help people overcome poverty,  access to health care, as well as numerous other issues.  The Republican party seems to be simply pro-birth, not pro-life.

Being pro-life is not incompatible with the Democratic Party.  In fact I'd argue that Democrats are the only ones who have presented actual plans to stop abortion.  Check out the Democrats for Life 95-10 Initiative; reducing the number of abortions by 95% in 10 years.  I know some of you will say it should be 100%, but that is simply not realistic.  Overturning Roe vs. Wade is not the solution.  If that happens, rich women will go to states or countries that allow it and poor women will resort to back-alley abortions, or  to their bathtubs with coathangers.

Ending abortion does not have a simple solution.  The lives of women need to be improved, they need to be educated on how to prevent unwanted pregnancies.  I think the Abstinence Plus programs are the way to go.  Enforcing the fact that abstinence is the only way to be 100% safe, but also telling them about birth control.  Most parents won't talk about that with their kids, and if they did, maybe we wouldn't have the problems we did.  No matter how hard people may try, there is no way to legislate good parenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also believe there is room for pro-life people in the Democratic party, precisely because they are consistent with their pro-life position; being against the death penalty as well, and generally in favor of better educational systems,  wanting to help people overcome poverty,  access to health care, as well as numerous other issues.  The Republican party seems to be simply pro-birth, not pro-life.</p>
<p>Being pro-life is not incompatible with the Democratic Party.  In fact I&#8217;d argue that Democrats are the only ones who have presented actual plans to stop abortion.  Check out the Democrats for Life 95-10 Initiative; reducing the number of abortions by 95% in 10 years.  I know some of you will say it should be 100%, but that is simply not realistic.  Overturning Roe vs. Wade is not the solution.  If that happens, rich women will go to states or countries that allow it and poor women will resort to back-alley abortions, or  to their bathtubs with coathangers.</p>
<p>Ending abortion does not have a simple solution.  The lives of women need to be improved, they need to be educated on how to prevent unwanted pregnancies.  I think the Abstinence Plus programs are the way to go.  Enforcing the fact that abstinence is the only way to be 100% safe, but also telling them about birth control.  Most parents won&#8217;t talk about that with their kids, and if they did, maybe we wouldn&#8217;t have the problems we did.  No matter how hard people may try, there is no way to legislate good parenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>Being pro-choice in no ways gives personal support for abortion. Pro-Choice means that the government does not have the right to control a person's reproduction or moral choices. If you have moral objections to abortion, which I find to be very reasonable, don't have one. I just don't believe that the federal government has the right to write legislation that pertains to people's personal private decisions.

I will extend an olive branch to the catholic democrats by saying that I, like the catholic democrats, oppose the death penalty. I believe that there is room in the democratic party for those people who consider themselve pro-life. Moreover, most reasonable people agree that we can reduce the number of abortions by promoting adoption, providing better access to contraception including the morning after pill, and programs aimed at providing relief to single mothers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being pro-choice in no ways gives personal support for abortion. Pro-Choice means that the government does not have the right to control a person&#8217;s reproduction or moral choices. If you have moral objections to abortion, which I find to be very reasonable, don&#8217;t have one. I just don&#8217;t believe that the federal government has the right to write legislation that pertains to people&#8217;s personal private decisions.</p>
<p>I will extend an olive branch to the catholic democrats by saying that I, like the catholic democrats, oppose the death penalty. I believe that there is room in the democratic party for those people who consider themselve pro-life. Moreover, most reasonable people agree that we can reduce the number of abortions by promoting adoption, providing better access to contraception including the morning after pill, and programs aimed at providing relief to single mothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michaela</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>You Democrats always want it both ways.  Democrats support abortion.  That means that you are pro-abortion, Adam.  The Democrats definitely support abortion.  Adam, your last statement says that you believe it is important for a woman to have a choice.....well, you just admitted that you support the murder of a child!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Democrats always want it both ways.  Democrats support abortion.  That means that you are pro-abortion, Adam.  The Democrats definitely support abortion.  Adam, your last statement says that you believe it is important for a woman to have a choice&#8230;..well, you just admitted that you support the murder of a child!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1534</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 06:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1534</guid>
		<description>There are alot of things that aren't in the constitution explicitly. That is why the supreme court ruled in 1965 based on the 'original intent' of the constitution.

Ricky, no one is for abortion. Overturning Roe will not decrease the abortion rate. I personally don't like abortion; however, I believe it is very important to give the choice to a women, her doctor, her deity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are alot of things that aren&#8217;t in the constitution explicitly. That is why the supreme court ruled in 1965 based on the &#8216;original intent&#8217; of the constitution.</p>
<p>Ricky, no one is for abortion. Overturning Roe will not decrease the abortion rate. I personally don&#8217;t like abortion; however, I believe it is very important to give the choice to a women, her doctor, her deity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricky ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>ricky ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 05:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Democrats aren't for abortion.... and the Nazis weren't against Jews, they just liked killing them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats aren&#8217;t for abortion&#8230;. and the Nazis weren&#8217;t against Jews, they just liked killing them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 04:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>If you can find the word "privacy" or any form thereof in the constitution or bill of rights, give me a call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can find the word &#8220;privacy&#8221; or any form thereof in the constitution or bill of rights, give me a call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>Let's get this point straight. Democrats are not pro-abortion. Democrats let the women decide what kind of healthcare they want. In 1965 in Griswold vs. Connecticut, the supreme court unamously stated the constitution does include the right to privacy. This 'right to privacy' protects decisions concerning family planning. I believe the government has no right to interfere in people's personal, private decisions.

Futhermore, if Roe v Wade is overturned, then the decision simply goes back to state legislatures. Thus, wealthier women would simply go to Massachusetts or New York...........states where there would be a right to abortion. If abortion is outlawed, then the result would be a rise in unsafe, back ally abortions. The number of abortions would remame high but would become dangerous.

I believe pro-choicers and pro-lifers could come together and find common ground. Abortions can be reduced by promoted contreptive, morning after pill, and comprehensive sex ed. This is better than criminalizing abortions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s get this point straight. Democrats are not pro-abortion. Democrats let the women decide what kind of healthcare they want. In 1965 in Griswold vs. Connecticut, the supreme court unamously stated the constitution does include the right to privacy. This &#8216;right to privacy&#8217; protects decisions concerning family planning. I believe the government has no right to interfere in people&#8217;s personal, private decisions.</p>
<p>Futhermore, if Roe v Wade is overturned, then the decision simply goes back to state legislatures. Thus, wealthier women would simply go to Massachusetts or New York&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..states where there would be a right to abortion. If abortion is outlawed, then the result would be a rise in unsafe, back ally abortions. The number of abortions would remame high but would become dangerous.</p>
<p>I believe pro-choicers and pro-lifers could come together and find common ground. Abortions can be reduced by promoted contreptive, morning after pill, and comprehensive sex ed. This is better than criminalizing abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>Crystal,

I agree wholeheartedly with your observation that poverty is not a matter of laziness, or moral failure.  You state as much in the second paragraph of your Aug. 25 posting. The last sentence of that same paragraph is very important because it shows a few flaws in the logic of your argument.
  We are talking about abortion, poverty and being Catholic.
We can start with being Catholic.  As you say Jesus teaches us how to treat the poor.  But you are mistaken if you think that Jesus limited his teaching to include only the financially destitue.
The poor that Jesus talks about are those who are unable to provide (not just material goods, but emotional, mental, spiritual goods included) for themselves.  We as Catholics seek to help our brothers and sisters with ALL of their needs financial and otherwize.
Abortion as you can see is a flash point for Catholics because we see that a truly poor person- the child- can provide nothing for him/herself.  The child has life; without any thought to the future cost or benifit to our society we must protect that life because it is in itself valuable enough to protect.
Crystal, you tried to set up a dicotomy between the Catholic stance on contraception and it's stance on abortion.  I assure you that no such problem exists.  The Church is not "trying to have it both ways"  by rejecting both contraception and abortion.  It is promoting the sanctity of life in one cohesive and coherent outlook. The thought that rejecting contraception creates a "need" for abortion is truly misguided.  There is never the "need" to eliminate an innocent person- even if that person is "undesired".

Sorry but just one last note.
Daniel O. is right to suggest a need for education on the topic of Benedict XVI.  Your history on this topic is very weak, and seems to be heavily influenced by mass media instead of fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crystal,</p>
<p>I agree wholeheartedly with your observation that poverty is not a matter of laziness, or moral failure.  You state as much in the second paragraph of your Aug. 25 posting. The last sentence of that same paragraph is very important because it shows a few flaws in the logic of your argument.<br />
  We are talking about abortion, poverty and being Catholic.<br />
We can start with being Catholic.  As you say Jesus teaches us how to treat the poor.  But you are mistaken if you think that Jesus limited his teaching to include only the financially destitue.<br />
The poor that Jesus talks about are those who are unable to provide (not just material goods, but emotional, mental, spiritual goods included) for themselves.  We as Catholics seek to help our brothers and sisters with ALL of their needs financial and otherwize.<br />
Abortion as you can see is a flash point for Catholics because we see that a truly poor person- the child- can provide nothing for him/herself.  The child has life; without any thought to the future cost or benifit to our society we must protect that life because it is in itself valuable enough to protect.<br />
Crystal, you tried to set up a dicotomy between the Catholic stance on contraception and it&#8217;s stance on abortion.  I assure you that no such problem exists.  The Church is not &#8220;trying to have it both ways&#8221;  by rejecting both contraception and abortion.  It is promoting the sanctity of life in one cohesive and coherent outlook. The thought that rejecting contraception creates a &#8220;need&#8221; for abortion is truly misguided.  There is never the &#8220;need&#8221; to eliminate an innocent person- even if that person is &#8220;undesired&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sorry but just one last note.<br />
Daniel O. is right to suggest a need for education on the topic of Benedict XVI.  Your history on this topic is very weak, and seems to be heavily influenced by mass media instead of fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michaela</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/catholic-democrats-of-nebraska/#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Crystal,

You don't know me, so you can't judge my amount of experience with this situation.  As a matter a fact, I have a great deal of job and classroom experience related with this topic.  Plus I am a Catholic.  You and I both know that as Catholics we are taught that abortion is wrong!  There's no way around this FACT!

Perhaps you should pay A LOT of attention at church when and THINK about what the Ten Commandments "THOU SHALL NOT KILL."  You keep dodging the topic of murder and worry about poverty.  Killing is A LOT worse than poverty!  So, you'd rather have a child killed than allow it to be born into our society that can allow them to be a productive person?

Again, have morals, have values and think before you get in any situations and have to deal with this issue!  If you have morals and values, you can abstain from this situation!

God will judge those who believe in abortion.....and I'll be praying for your soul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crystal,</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t know me, so you can&#8217;t judge my amount of experience with this situation.  As a matter a fact, I have a great deal of job and classroom experience related with this topic.  Plus I am a Catholic.  You and I both know that as Catholics we are taught that abortion is wrong!  There&#8217;s no way around this FACT!</p>
<p>Perhaps you should pay A LOT of attention at church when and THINK about what the Ten Commandments &#8220;THOU SHALL NOT KILL.&#8221;  You keep dodging the topic of murder and worry about poverty.  Killing is A LOT worse than poverty!  So, you&#8217;d rather have a child killed than allow it to be born into our society that can allow them to be a productive person?</p>
<p>Again, have morals, have values and think before you get in any situations and have to deal with this issue!  If you have morals and values, you can abstain from this situation!</p>
<p>God will judge those who believe in abortion&#8230;..and I&#8217;ll be praying for your soul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

