Archive for the 'National' Category

Democratic Congress: Kick’n It For College Kidz

The U.S. Congress hasn’t been too great on a lot of things (getting us out of Iraq, stopping Bush’s conservative agenda), but they’ve been doing a great job going to bat for students on the issue of Student Loans & College Cost Reduction.

Just last week a very important piece of legislation was passed through the Congress which (if signed into law) is going to make college costs a lot lower for all of us. The speaker’s office put the above video together… it’s a spoof on all those eHarmony dating service adds.

Lee Terry vs Sick Poor Children

Lee Terry Hates Poor Kids

You see, today Terry & 158 of his extreme-right-wing friends (including Nebraska’s other two congressmen, Smith & Fortenberry) voted against the SCHIP renewal and expansion. Thankfully, the bill still passed with a huge bipartisan majority of 265 votes.

CHIP (the Childrens Health Insurance Program) was a 1990s program that provided Medicare-style health insurance to poor kids who can’t otherwise get coverage.

On a personal note… I am a direct beneficiary of CHIP. Without it, I would not have had health insurance for a significant portion of my childhood. Anyone who has ever had the fortune / misfortune to hear me play guitar can thank CHIP, since I broke my finger when I was little playing football, and CHIP allowed me to get it fixed.

But passing this bill isn’t about me, it’s about the 65,000 kids in Nebraska who will loose their health insurance options if Lee Terry has his way.

Here are some key stats on Nebraska SCHIP health insurance:

    Number of Nebraskan kids enrolled in CHIP: 44,981
    Number of Nebraskan kids eligible for CHIP or Medicaid but not enrolled: 18,211
    2008 Funds available under bipartisan bill: $42,204,503

So, let’s get this straight: Lee Terry just voted against insuring poor kids. Specifically, he voted against 65 thousand of those kids right here in Nebraska, and he voted against 40 million dollars in funding Nebraska would have gotten to help pay for those kids.

Good job Lee, way to show your true colors.

John McCain is Rapidly Imploding

On the heels of fundraising numbers that left him near the bottom of the Republican field, John McCain announced the resignations of his campaign manager Terry Nelson and chief strategist John Weaver.

McCain has been burning money at a rapid pace, and let go about 50 staffers last week. Now he’s losing his top two campaign staffers, and has less cash on hand than Ron Paul.

At this point, it’s become clear that John McCain has no chance of winning the Republican nomination. His full-throated support of an immigration bill that was poison to the Republican base just sealed the deal. Republicans have known John McCain for a while now, and they just don’t like him.

It’s down to three candidates right now: Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, and Mitt Romney. Giuliani’s the strongest general election candidate, but Republicans are going to be very wary of nominating someone who publicly advocates for a woman’s right to choose. Thompson is the conservative darling right now, though, oddly, his record in the Senate was very similar to that of John McCain. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney has shown no scruples about changing his position on a dime to pander to the Republican base - and the Republican base doesn’t seem to mind it much.

If I had to guess right now, I’d say Mitt Romney’s going to be the Republican nominee - he is looking strong in Iowa and New Hampshire, while Giuliani is going to have a lot of trouble with social conservatives. But six months ago, I thought McCain was going to win the nomination. So take it with a grain of salt.

Hagel Fuels More Speculation

On Meet The Press today, Chuck Hagel ruled out a bid for President as an independent.

He gave more cryptic answers when asked about his political plans:

“You try to keep as many options open for yourself in life as you can. And you try to be in a position where you’ve got some opportunities,” Hagel said.

“I also have said and said this when I first ran for the Senate after I got elected in 1996 that 12 years, two terms may be enough and that’s another option,” Hagel said.

“And then if there might be a place for me along the presidential road somewhere to try to have some influence and change the course of this country, then I’ll look at that. But the decision needs to be made soon and I’ll make it soon,” he added.

It’s really difficult to tell exactly where Hagel’s leaning right now. He clearly wants to have influence on the national scene, but he’s blown any chance of winning a Republican nomination for President by making sense on Iraq. And he’s in an increasingly vulnerable position here at home, as well. A primary challenger raising $700,000 in Q2 is very serious, indeed. It may be that by attempting to keep all of his options open, Hagel has shut the door on all of his options.

On the surface, Hagel seems like the ideal candidate for the Republicans to separate their party from the failures of George W. Bush in Iraq. But the GOP is increasingly a Cult of Bush, and Hagel’s apostasy on the Iraq War will not be easily forgiven by primary voters. He has zero chance of winning the Republican nomination.

An independent candidacy would be a fool’s errand, as Hagel would lack the donor base to mount a respectable campaign that would fare any better than Ralph Nader or Michael Badnarik in 2004. In other words, there’s even less of a chance that Hagel becomes President if he runs as an independent.

It seems that Hagel’s goal is relevance as he finalizes what, precisely, his plans will be in 2008. A chance at the Vice Presidency or a plum position in the next administration is probably his most likely avenue, but how he gets there is anyone’s guess.

Bloomberg Leaves GOP; Is Hagel Next?

bloomberg.jpg

 

 Possibly setting the stage for an independent bid for President, billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg left the Republican Party yesterday, changing his party affiliation to “unaffiliated.”

But let’s not fool ourselves here. This is a man who changed his party affiliation to Republican so he wouldn’t have to deal with a competitive Democratic primary in 2001. He’s openly courting Chuck Hagel to be his running mate. But the “independence” of such a ticket would be in serious question.

It’s unclear what possible constituency a Bloomberg candidacy would have. He seems to be buying into the fallacy that the Democratic Party and the Republican Party represent opposite ends of the ideological spectrum, and that there is a void that can only be filled by a third party candidate. But the truth is this: as the Republican Party has moved further and further to the right, the Democratic Party has come to represent mainstream America. Look at any of the most important issues, and the majority of the American people agree with the Democratic Party. From terrorism, to Iraq, to health care, to the economy, Americans trust Democrats. (We’d do well to earn that trust, but that’s another discussion for another day).

But right now, I’d say Bloomberg appeals more to disaffected Republicans than any Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents. Lovely how Republicans love to pull the experience card, except when it comes to mayors running for President.

 

 

Fred Thompson and the GOP’s Messiah Complex

Ryan wrote last week at the NNN about the opening for Chuck Hagel in the Republican electorate. The meat of the argument: Iowa Republicans (and Republicans in general) are actually quite against the war. At least when you ask them about it as an issue. But Republicans have been rabid and cultlike in their support of a failed presidency. It’s not speaking against the war in Iraq that gets you into trouble with Republicans - it’s speaking against George W. Bush.

Even Mitch McConnell two weeks ago conceded that Hagel has been mostly right about the war in Iraq. So, why, then, are many Republicans ready to get rid of him in Nebraska? Why is his candidacy for President a non-starter among Republicans nationally? It has a lot to do with the fact that he’s been a vocal critic of George W. Bush, even daring to bring up the “I” word as a possible solution to Bush’s refusal to take accountability.

If the Republicans simply wanted a hawk, John McCain would be running away with the nomination. Their current disgust with the candidates reflects more than a disconnect on the issues, but a disconnect on strategy and a disconnect with their base. In order to win in 2008, the Republican Party needs to run far, far away from Bush. But, since their base is the 28% of Americans who still support Bush, they have to tread lightly.

So, they cloak their language in code-words: “Ronald Reagan Republican,” a “true conservative,” etc., painting the failures of the Bush administration not as failures of the Republican Party, but failures of the administration to adhere to conservative values. Fed up with “Rudy McRomney,” the Republicans find themselves searching for a candidate that they can stomach.

Which brings us to Fred Thompson, the Republican Messiah du jour. Thompson was a U.S. Senator from Tennessee from 1994-2003. During that time, he was a co-sponsor of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance legislation that is poison to Republican ears. They speak of Fred Thompson’s “charisma” as if they know another Fred Thompson. They’re willing to project onto Thompson whatever they want to believe he can be. As an actor by trade, Thompson is more than willing to play the part.

Problem is, he’s not a very good actor, and I suspect even Republicans will grow tired of his act by the time we reach September. We’re seven months away from the first contest of the 2008 election, and I haven’t the slightest clue who the Republican nominee will be. But they’ll keep looking for someone, to save the Republican Party from itself.

I Agree With Rudy Giuliani…

Wait. Did I really just say that?

Yeah. In case you missed it, Republican frontrunner Rudy Giuliani decided this week that he is going to run as a pro-choice Republican:

After months of conflicting signals on abortion, Rudolph W. Giuliani is planning to offer a forthright affirmation of his support for abortion rights in public forums, television appearances and interviews in the coming days, despite the potential for bad consequences among some conservative voters already wary of his views, aides said yesterday.

“Ultimately,” Giuliani said, “there has to be a right to choose.”

I cannot emphasize enough how significant this is. For thirty years now, the fight for a woman’s right to choose has been largely waged on partisan grounds (which means that even if you personally disagree with Ben Nelson, ultimately the fact that he’s a Democrat helps women’s rights considerably). Republicans have been “pro-life,” while Democrats have been “pro-choice.” And to run against that in your own party, particularly for the Presidential nomination, is very nearly political suicide. Jerome Armstrong at MyDD has a great analysis of what this is going to do to the debate on the Republican side.

For a while, it looked like the war would be a central division in the Republican electorate, but the Cult of Bush has remained strong. It may still happen, particularly if Hagel gets into the race, but for now, the central issue for Republicans is going to be choice. And at every opportunity, Giuliani is going to be hammered by the other Republican contenders.

This isn’t The West Wing, folks. If Giuliani’s really going to seek the nomination of the Republican Party as a pro-choice candidate, he can kiss any chance he has of winning goodbye. They’ll all flock to Fred Thompson, or whoever the hell they think is the second coming of St. Ronnie today.

But this is going to radically shift the debate about choice in a direction that favors women’s rights. The frontrunner for the Republican nomination is saying that we have to recognize a woman’s right to choose. That’s significant. If he ultimately ends up winning, the religious right’s influence on the Republican Party could be dead. Now, I don’t think that’s going to happen, in fact quite the opposite, but they’re welcome to drive their party further to the right and alienate everyone who recognizes the need for sane, reasonable policy when it comes to reproductive health.

Keep an eye on the Republican Presidential race, is all I’m saying. It’s going to be entertaining.

(Any takers on when the first “Rudy: Baby Killer” ad is coming?)

Mission Accomplished

mission-accomplished.jpg

May 1, 2003 will forever go down in history as one of the most craven moments of political theater in American history, a horrendously detached and cynically staged event that showed little concern for reality. In other words, the events aboard the U.S.S Abraham Lincoln that day pretty much encapsulate the Bush administration as a whole. Without regard for what the word actually meant, George W. Bush that day declared victory. Now, four years later, after 3,211 have died since the “end of major combat operations in Iraq,” Bush and his lemmings in the Republican Party attempt to lecture the American people about the costs of failure. The people who have been wrong about everything now make predictions about the disaster that has already occurred in Iraq.

Something to keep in mind as the Democrats send the Iraq War bill to President Bush’s desk today, specifically timed for his veto on May 1, 2007. Four years to the day after he played dress-up and pretended the war was over.

Now, the doomsday scenarios are of a failed state, a haven for terrorists, where they can easily stage attacks on Americans. A civil war with massive deaths between the warring factions of Sunni and Shia. A loss of American prestige at home and abroad. I’ve got news for you: those things have already happened.

The Iraqi state has failed. There’s no denying that at this point. It cannot exist without the backing of the United States military. Because of this, it’s seen as a puppet regime, illegitimate and carrying out the United States’ interests. This is the major reason why, although a vast majority of Iraqis want the United States out of Iraq, the Iraqi government insists on our presence there. If we leave, the government will fall. If we stay, the government will be seen as completely illegitimate. No one can look at the news each day and conclude that Iraq has not become a haven for terrorists. That’s what happens when you create a power vacuum and disenfranchise half of the population. You can’t change that now. The only thing you can do is get your people out of there so they don’t get killed.

Which brings me to the most absolutely ludicrous and ridiculous bullshit line that the right wing has spread about this war the last couple of years. I’m sure you know the one I’m talking about: We’re fighting them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here. Or any similar line of reason. My favorite has to be the absolutely childish: If we leave Iraq, they will follow us home. Evidently, al-Qaeda has a navy I was not aware of, or an army of amphibious soldiers who can swim across the Atlantic.

The point should be painfully obvious to anyone with half an ounce of reason in their body: they already know where we are! It’s not as if our war in Iraq is somehow deterring them from coming over here, it’s just providing them with an easy target to kill Americans, every day. Consider the tragedy that happened at Virginia Tech two weeks ago. Now consider that on that Monday, over 150 people died in a series of attacks in Iraq. As sad as it is to say, 33 dead is a good day in Baghdad. And our soldiers are in the middle of it.

As the last six years have so tragically demonstrated, this administration has not the slightest CLUE how to run an effective intelligence organization. From ignoring the warning signs of 9/11, to falsifying intelligence about Iraq, to ignoring accurate intelligence that conflicted with their own view of reality, the Bush administration has caused decades worth of damage to our national image. And now we are supposed to trust their view, which says a military solution to an endless war against an unclear enemy is not only the only option, but refusing to go along with that option will result in catastrophic failure. The only catastrophic failure in this conversation is the administration’s Iraq policy. If that was your goal, Mr. President, to create a colossal fuck-up that makes Vietnam look well-reasoned by comparison, well - Mission Accomplished.

Update: by john. Mission Accomplished By The Numbers, via ThinkProgress.

Tribute To The Fallen - Photo Blog

Photos from the first night of Tribute are up in the photo gallery. We’ll be adding more as the week goes on. Special thanks so far to 40 or so volunteers who showed up to place flags, and the the members of the media (CBS, NBC, Fox, and the Omaha World-Herald so far…) who have covered the event.

Also of course a very special thanks to Mayor Mike Fahey, Councilman Suttle, Councilman Gernandt, Sen. Tom White, Douglas Co. Treasurer John Ewing, and Douglas County Registrar of Deeds Diane Battiatto for their kind words at the opening ceremony.

As always, don’t forget to check www.tributetothefallen.com for more updates.

Senator Gwen Howard with UNO Democrats

Anna and Nick place flags at Tribute To The Fallen 2007

more photos in the extended entry… click “continue reading”

Continue reading ‘Tribute To The Fallen - Photo Blog’

Adrian Smith Showing Weakness

While I usually leave everything related to the 3rd District, Adrian Smith, or Western Nebraska to our wonderful friends over at SmithWatch… I just couldn’t help but point out the obvious (well obvious if you’re a geek like me who like to read FEC Fundraising Numbers).

Adrian Smith, the brand-new Republican congressman from the 3rd, just can’t seem to get very good at fundraising. You see, when running for Congress lots of people want to give you money; especially when you’re a Republican in a very Republican district like Smith was. Which was why it was suprising that Smith wasn’t able to raise much much more than he did last time around. That left many of us to speculate that he just isn’t very good at raising money.

Now that doesn’t make him a bad congressman (if you want to know why he’s a bad congressman, just spend ten minutes over at SmithWatch yourself)… I can think of a number of Democratic candidates who weren’t very good at raising money but who I love dearly.

But it could be a problem for Adrian if he still can’t raise any money. You see, when you’re a first term congressman people really love to give you money. Now that Smith is in Congress he should be able to raise lots of easy dollars every two years from PACs of companies affected by the committee he sits on. The corrupt way this works is one of the big reasons Jim Esch pledged not to take PAC money last time around… but I digress.

But in the last quarter, Smith only raised $104,000… not counting his $30k in debt left over from the last campaign. That means Smith’s Cash On Hand (CoH) is only about $65,000… compare that to Lee Terry’s $215k CoH.

So is Scott Kleeb going to step up and run again? Well, Scott still has nearly as much in the bank as Smith did, at $64k.

Run Scott! Run!



replica watches swiss replica watches best replica watches high quality replica watches replica cartier watches replica watches for sale movado replica watches cheap replica big watches from china buy replica watches replica swiss watches ladies replica watches tag heuer watches replica replica breitling watches quality replica watches for sale quality replica watches jacob co replica watches zenith replica watches quality replica cartier watches replica designer watches mens replica watches womens replica breitling watches replica omega watches millinium replica watches replica rado watches high end replica watches cartier replica watches replica watches perfect breitling replica watches replica ebel watches highest quality replica watches replica watches china swiss made replica watches rado replica watches frank muller replica watches replica ball watches replica franck muller watches in istanbul raymond weil replica watches replica watches supplier jacob 26 replica watches money order brietling replica watches chanel replica watches replica watches tag heuer tiger woods replica role watches good place to get replica watches in new york city replica rolex watches queens bvlgari replica watches panerai watches replica famous brand replica watches famous replica watches replica tag heuer watches iced out replica watches porsche design replica watches best replica cartier watches bell and ross watches replica replica bell and ross watches aaa replica watches philip stein teslar replica watches gold digital designer replica watches replica watches sold in uk tag heuer replica watches louis vuitton replica watches submariner replica watches replica watches bazaar lady replica watches roger dubuis replica watches movodo replica watches replica watches cool watches rss feed discount replica watches replica michelle watches replica panerai watches replica jacob and company watches replica roger dubuis hommage watches resetting rolex replica watches replica rolex watches replica coach watches replica watches corum replica omega speedmaster watches replica watches supplyer watches replica wholesale replica watches replica raymond weil watches replica air king watches replica chanel watches replica breitling emergency watches replica luminox watches omega replica watches specials wholesale replica designer watches demassa replica watches tag heuer carrera replica watches automatic movement replica michele watches replica bertling watches swiss replica michele watches replica watches overnight delivery replica watches corum bridge of gold replica designer watches tag best swiss replica watches patek philippe replica watches replica watches specials replica watches wholsaler franck muller replica watches replica date just watches wholesale seiko replica watches tag heuer replica watches automatic movement