Archive for the 'Iraq' Category

Betrayal

You’re not going to get a whole lot of “go team” from me this week, and I suspect that a lot of my friends here are on the same page. I want to specifically focus this rant on our elected officials and the absolute act of betrayal that they committed today. To start, there’s Keith Olbermann’s (as-always) on-target Special Comment about the war spending bill that the Democrats allowed to pass:

That says it all, really. I can’t find much solace in the fact that Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton voted against this bill. It doesn’t speak much of their leadership that the bill passed with an overwhelming bipartisan majority. And this is what I’ve been saying all along: the brand of bipartisanship that exists in Washington is a load of horseshit. It generally consists of the Democrats capitulating to the will of the Republicans, and the Republicans never budging on a single issue.

Today, by overwhelming majorities, both houses of Congress gave President Bush everything he wanted, a blank check to conduct the war in Iraq. This is just sickening. The ultimate act of political cowardice by individuals who have no business being a majority party. You wonder why people don’t think Democrats stand for anything? This is why! This was the Democratic majority “showing the way,” if by “showing the way,” you mean being led around by the nose by a warmongering failure of a President.

If they are this deaf to the will of the American people, the Democrats deserve to lose in 2008.

Blank Checks and Spoiled Children

The new House Democratic proposal to end the war in Iraq offers major concessions to the President: there is no timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq. Instead, the proposal temporarily funds the war through July (though the money to fund the war through July is already in the pipeline). It no longer includes the funds for agricultural relief - those will be put into a separate bill. And the “troop readiness standards” proposed by Rep. John Murtha have been scrapped from the bill, as well.

The new plan? Attach the next two months of funding after to a vote by Congress on withdrawal. Bush must submit a report to Congress by July 13 on progress in Iraq, and after that, the House and Senate will vote on whether to continue funding the war, or to use the money to begin withdrawing our troops from Iraq.

Bush would veto this bill.

Why? Well, it should be clear by now. The President wants a blank check to conduct undending war in Iraq. And here’s what happens next:

The Pentagon announced yesterday that 35,000 soldiers in 10 Army combat brigades will begin deploying to Iraq in August as replacements, making it possible to sustain the increase of U.S. troops there until at least the end of this year.

U.S. commanders in Iraq are increasingly convinced that heightened troop levels, announced by President Bush in January, will need to last into the spring of 2008. The military has said it would assess in September how well its counterinsurgency strategy, intended to pacify Baghdad and other parts of Iraq, is working.

Remember when the surge was supposed to be temporary?  I hope no one actually bought that line. But, clearly, the Republicans have. They’re willing to give the administration until September to come up with a new lie and some reason why they should continue to ignore the will of the American people, who have demanded an end to this war.

I think it should be clear by now to anyone observing the fight in Congress to end this war that the Republican Party has no intention of leaving Iraq. Ever. 

Bush has increasingly operated like a spoiled child in this debate. He wants it his way, and no way else. But, fortunately, the President’s preferred option in this case - a blank check to conduct unending war in Iraq - is a non-starter with this Congress, as it should be, because it’s a non-starter with the majority of Americans.

3,381 Americans have died in Iraq. 3,240 since “Mission Accomplished.” 295 since the “Surge” began. 47 since we took down the flags two weeks ago. 30 in the month of May, alone, including one Nebraskan.

I don’t have any doubt which side of the debate Lee Terry, Jeff Fortenberry, and Adrian Smith will come down on, and it’s heartbreaking to realize that. These are matters of life and death. The administration has had enough time. It’s time to get out. It’s time for our troops to come home safely. This is the mandate we gave Congress in November. And they will continue to use that mandate until you listen.

What Did Lee Terry Learn In Iraq?

Deepest apologies for being a week late with this analysis, but I couldn’t let Lee Terry’s Iraq visit go unnoticed.

Here’s a sample of Lee Terry’s in-depth reaction to the situation in Iraq:

“Some politicians in Washington wrongly believe they should declare Iraq a lost cause and broadcast a false message that demoralizes our troops and emboldens the enemy,” Terry said. “The briefings I received from military commanders and discussions I had with Iraqi leaders showed me otherwise – that the war is not lost, and the Iraqis are pleading that not abandon them.

Listen, I don’t doubt the sincerity of Lee Terry’s beliefs. It’s just that he’s wrong. And in the face of evidence that he’s so terribly wrong, he chooses to ignore the evidence. Fortunately, for his sake, he doesn’t make any comparisons between the streets of Baghdad and the Old Market similar to those of his colleague Mike Pence of Indiana. So maybe there’s a bit of hope - he’s not completely detached from reality.

As Smith Watch pointed out when Adrian Smith took his trip to Iraq, Terry himself made the observation that is increasingly clear as we look at his reaction to this trip:

Terry said he has noticed that other congressmen’s rhetoric on the House floor remains the same after their trips to Iraq.

He said his goal on the trip with Nelson is to keep an open mind and assess the problems, not just reinforce his preconceived notions of what’s going on. He said being in Iraq beats a briefing in Washington.

“You just have a deeper level of understanding when you have your own feet on the ground,” Terry said.

Of course, looking at Terry’s rhetoric after the visit to Iraq, it seems to be exactly the same as his rhetoric before the visit. And given the facts and the realities of the situation on the ground, it’s difficult to believe that Terry had an accurate picture of Iraq before his visit. In fact, given his rhetoric, it’s clear that he doesn’t. It’s difficult to see any optimism in what was the deadliest month of violence in Iraq in 2007. It’s hard to believe that, after 4 years, there are any reasons to hope for progress. Terry himself seems to be scrambling for anything to cling to, suggesting that perhaps he didn’t quite “keep an open mind” about his visit.

Terry’s arguments have been typical of his stance on Iraq - though thankfully, at least this time, devoid of any reference to “islamofascists” or “jihadists.” There’s little change in his rhetoric from before his visit to after his visit.

Just remember - this is Lee Terry’s “open mind.” There’s so much wrong with this war it makes me sick - but how the pro-war crowd can still justify it to themselves is beyond disgraceful, and impugning the loyalty of those of us who want to be responsible citizens in the world is the height of hypocrisy.

NE-Sen: A Majority Of Nebraskans Want Out Of Iraq…

The Nebraska Democratic Party released polling information today that shows Senator Chuck Hagel in an extremely vulnerable position among the Nebraska electorate. Take a moment to read over the numbers:

According to the findings of the recent statewide survey of Nebraska, Hagel is on a dangerous terrain, particularly if he is to face Bruning in a Republican primary. Today, Hagel earns a net negative job performance score statewide with 42 percent of voters saying he is doing an excellent-to-good job, while a majority, 50 percent, says fair-to-poor. Hagel’s job performance is most negative with his Republican base, while it is net positive among Democrats and solidly mixed among independents. Among conservative Republicans, Hagel’s professional marks have crumbled, with almost two-thirds, 61 percent, saying he is doing a fair-to-poor job as Senator.

Those are eye-opening numbers, and suddenly seem to confirm Bruning’s polling from a week ago. However, these numbers also suggest that it’s not the war that’s driving the disapproval of Hagel. And, in what I believe to be the most significant finding of the poll, a majority of Nebraskans now favor a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.

Among those Nebraskans surveyed, 51 percent favor a timetable for withdrawing from Iraq, while only 37 percent believe we need to give the President’s troop surge plan a chance to work. We believe those margins will continue to widen as the President’s policy plays out in the next several months.

Mission Accomplished

mission-accomplished.jpg

May 1, 2003 will forever go down in history as one of the most craven moments of political theater in American history, a horrendously detached and cynically staged event that showed little concern for reality. In other words, the events aboard the U.S.S Abraham Lincoln that day pretty much encapsulate the Bush administration as a whole. Without regard for what the word actually meant, George W. Bush that day declared victory. Now, four years later, after 3,211 have died since the “end of major combat operations in Iraq,” Bush and his lemmings in the Republican Party attempt to lecture the American people about the costs of failure. The people who have been wrong about everything now make predictions about the disaster that has already occurred in Iraq.

Something to keep in mind as the Democrats send the Iraq War bill to President Bush’s desk today, specifically timed for his veto on May 1, 2007. Four years to the day after he played dress-up and pretended the war was over.

Now, the doomsday scenarios are of a failed state, a haven for terrorists, where they can easily stage attacks on Americans. A civil war with massive deaths between the warring factions of Sunni and Shia. A loss of American prestige at home and abroad. I’ve got news for you: those things have already happened.

The Iraqi state has failed. There’s no denying that at this point. It cannot exist without the backing of the United States military. Because of this, it’s seen as a puppet regime, illegitimate and carrying out the United States’ interests. This is the major reason why, although a vast majority of Iraqis want the United States out of Iraq, the Iraqi government insists on our presence there. If we leave, the government will fall. If we stay, the government will be seen as completely illegitimate. No one can look at the news each day and conclude that Iraq has not become a haven for terrorists. That’s what happens when you create a power vacuum and disenfranchise half of the population. You can’t change that now. The only thing you can do is get your people out of there so they don’t get killed.

Which brings me to the most absolutely ludicrous and ridiculous bullshit line that the right wing has spread about this war the last couple of years. I’m sure you know the one I’m talking about: We’re fighting them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here. Or any similar line of reason. My favorite has to be the absolutely childish: If we leave Iraq, they will follow us home. Evidently, al-Qaeda has a navy I was not aware of, or an army of amphibious soldiers who can swim across the Atlantic.

The point should be painfully obvious to anyone with half an ounce of reason in their body: they already know where we are! It’s not as if our war in Iraq is somehow deterring them from coming over here, it’s just providing them with an easy target to kill Americans, every day. Consider the tragedy that happened at Virginia Tech two weeks ago. Now consider that on that Monday, over 150 people died in a series of attacks in Iraq. As sad as it is to say, 33 dead is a good day in Baghdad. And our soldiers are in the middle of it.

As the last six years have so tragically demonstrated, this administration has not the slightest CLUE how to run an effective intelligence organization. From ignoring the warning signs of 9/11, to falsifying intelligence about Iraq, to ignoring accurate intelligence that conflicted with their own view of reality, the Bush administration has caused decades worth of damage to our national image. And now we are supposed to trust their view, which says a military solution to an endless war against an unclear enemy is not only the only option, but refusing to go along with that option will result in catastrophic failure. The only catastrophic failure in this conversation is the administration’s Iraq policy. If that was your goal, Mr. President, to create a colossal fuck-up that makes Vietnam look well-reasoned by comparison, well - Mission Accomplished.

Update: by john. Mission Accomplished By The Numbers, via ThinkProgress.

Not One More

Note: The Tribute To The Fallen event that we held this week has no partisan purpose, and whether you are for or against the war, I think we all agree that our men and women in the military deserve honor and respect. We aren’t going to tell you what to think about the war, and we hope that you can respect the fact that most of us believe this war should end. That said, the UNO College Democrats Blog is a partisan blog, and we pride ourselves on having frank and honest discussions about the issues. We’ve spoken about Iraq here before, and we will do it again. And with the emotions that this week’s Tribute brought out in all of us, I think it would be wrong to stay silent. The opinions expressed in this post are mine, and you are welcome to disagree with them. But I think those soldiers who the 3,334 flags represent deserve this debate. They deserved it long before this war began.

On Monday, nine soldiers died in Iraq. Among those soldiers were two Nebraskans, Ken Locker, Jr. and Kevin Gaspers. Monday night, as we were placing the flags for Tribute, we had to add nine more flags for these soldiers. Tuesday, after we finished reading the names of the dead, two more died, and we added two more flags for those fallen. 3,334 American flags, representing 3,334 men and women who are never coming back home. 3,334 families who will never see them again. 3,334 brave Americans who gave their lives for this country.

But the tragedy of this war is grander than the American lives lost. The thousands of wounded American soldiers whose lives will never be the same. The thousands of Americans who are seperated from their loved ones. The thousands of Iraqi soldiers who die each month. The tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians who have died in the streets and marketplaces of Iraq. The millions of refugees who have fled their homes in fear. We have no flags for them. They are forgotten.

Our sincerest hope is that next year, there won’t be any more flags in the ground. Not one more. We realize how futile this hope is. Between the time that we took the flags down last night, and the time of this writing, three more Americans have died in Iraq. 3,337. April of 2007 is the deadliest month in Iraq in 3 years, yet our President continues to insist that his “new strategy” is working. We need our troops out of Iraq. We need them home.

Not one more day in Iraq. Not one more lie from this administration. Not one more life lost. Not one more flag in the ground. It’s time to bring our toops home.

Tribute To The Fallen - Photo Blog

Photos from the first night of Tribute are up in the photo gallery. We’ll be adding more as the week goes on. Special thanks so far to 40 or so volunteers who showed up to place flags, and the the members of the media (CBS, NBC, Fox, and the Omaha World-Herald so far…) who have covered the event.

Also of course a very special thanks to Mayor Mike Fahey, Councilman Suttle, Councilman Gernandt, Sen. Tom White, Douglas Co. Treasurer John Ewing, and Douglas County Registrar of Deeds Diane Battiatto for their kind words at the opening ceremony.

As always, don’t forget to check www.tributetothefallen.com for more updates.

Senator Gwen Howard with UNO Democrats

Anna and Nick place flags at Tribute To The Fallen 2007

more photos in the extended entry… click “continue reading”

Continue reading ‘Tribute To The Fallen - Photo Blog’

Tribute To The Fallen

Last year, on April 25, 2006, the UNO Democrats presented a Tribute to the Fallen. This week, we are privileged and honored to again present this Tribute to the men and women who have given their lives in service to this great nation.

The war in Iraq inspires intense feelings on both sides of the aisle, as frequent readers of this blog can no doubt attest. But above all else, we hold nothing but the highest respect for the men and women fighting in Iraq right now. And it is with deep respect and the utmost dignity that we present this tribute to our fallen soldiers.

Last year, we placed 2,390 flags, each representing one life lost in this war. Since then, almost 1,000 more American soldiers have died in Iraq. But they are more than just numbers, they were brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, husbands, wives, fathers, and mothers. Many of them were our age. Each loss is tragic, the grief shared by their friends and family unimaginable. These soldiers deserve our highest respect. They all fought and died for this country, for the very freedoms that make this nation so great.

Regardless of what you believe about the war in Iraq, we hope that you will join with us this week in honoring the sacrifice that these brave young men and women have made for this country. And that they will not be forgotten. That the scope of this tragedy is more than just a number, but something that all of us can see.

Please join us on Tuesday morning at 8 a.m. begin our Tribute, reading the names of each fallen soldier, and on Thursday evening at 5 p.m. as we honor the Nebraska soldiers who have died in Iraq. All throughout the week, the flags will remain standing, a reminder of the sacrifice of each and every man and woman to whom we pay Tribute.

Senate Approves Iraq Bill 51-47

NYT:

WASHINGTON, March 29 — The Senate narrowly approved a war-spending bill today that calls for most American combat troops to be out of Iraq by March 31, 2008, and in so doing defied a veto threat by President Bush.

The 51-to-47 vote endorsed a $122 billion spending package, most of which would go to the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns, although some domestic spending is included.

Every Democrat voted for the bill, along with Chuck Hagel and Gordon Smith. 46 Republicans and Joe Lieberman voted against it. It will go to conference and then on to the President for an almost certain veto.

Nebraska Senators Provide an Important Victory in Iraq Debate

Chuck Hagel and Ben Nelson did us proud today:

The Senate defeated an attempt to erase an American troop withdrawal date from an Iraq spending bill this afternoon after an emotional debate about the powers of the presidency and Congress and the well-being of front-line soldiers.

By a vote of 50 to 48, the Senate allowed a withdrawal date of March 31, 2008, to remain in the $122 billion bill, which has yet to be acted upon. The majority defeated an amendment offered by Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi, the ranking Republican on the Appropriations Committee, that would have removed the date.

Nelson and Hagel both opposed a Senate resolution calling for a March 31 deadline last week. Their votes against this amendment allowed the amendment to be defeated. Nebraska’s Senators were the only two Senators to change their votes on a withdrawal timeline from last week.

Nelson released a statement last week stating his support for the Senate spending bill, and though he is not in favor of a timeline, he came on board due to benchmark language included in the bill, which he had a hand in crafting. Kudos to Nelson for standing up to Republican efforts to neuter this bill.

Hagel, meanwhile, is teaming up with Virginia Senator Jim Webb to add troop readiness provisions to the bill. The Cochran amendment was the key obstacle to passage of this bill, so it should be able to pass the Senate, but they’ll have to work out some things in conference before sending it off to the President for an almost certain veto.



replica watches swiss replica watches best replica watches high quality replica watches replica cartier watches replica watches for sale movado replica watches cheap replica big watches from china buy replica watches replica swiss watches ladies replica watches tag heuer watches replica replica breitling watches quality replica watches for sale quality replica watches jacob co replica watches zenith replica watches quality replica cartier watches replica designer watches mens replica watches womens replica breitling watches replica omega watches millinium replica watches replica rado watches high end replica watches cartier replica watches replica watches perfect breitling replica watches replica ebel watches highest quality replica watches replica watches china swiss made replica watches rado replica watches frank muller replica watches replica ball watches replica franck muller watches in istanbul raymond weil replica watches replica watches supplier jacob 26 replica watches money order brietling replica watches chanel replica watches replica watches tag heuer tiger woods replica role watches good place to get replica watches in new york city replica rolex watches queens bvlgari replica watches panerai watches replica famous brand replica watches famous replica watches replica tag heuer watches iced out replica watches porsche design replica watches best replica cartier watches bell and ross watches replica replica bell and ross watches aaa replica watches philip stein teslar replica watches gold digital designer replica watches replica watches sold in uk tag heuer replica watches louis vuitton replica watches submariner replica watches replica watches bazaar lady replica watches roger dubuis replica watches movodo replica watches replica watches cool watches rss feed discount replica watches replica michelle watches replica panerai watches replica jacob and company watches replica roger dubuis hommage watches resetting rolex replica watches replica rolex watches replica coach watches replica watches corum replica omega speedmaster watches replica watches supplyer watches replica wholesale replica watches replica raymond weil watches replica air king watches replica chanel watches replica breitling emergency watches replica luminox watches omega replica watches specials wholesale replica designer watches demassa replica watches tag heuer carrera replica watches automatic movement replica michele watches replica bertling watches swiss replica michele watches replica watches overnight delivery replica watches corum bridge of gold replica designer watches tag best swiss replica watches patek philippe replica watches replica watches specials replica watches wholsaler franck muller replica watches replica date just watches wholesale seiko replica watches tag heuer replica watches automatic movement