<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Supreme Court&#8217;s Definition of &#8220;Free Speech&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/06/26/the-supreme-courts-definition-of-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/06/26/the-supreme-courts-definition-of-free-speech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:04:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2007 - A Year In Review at U. of Nebraska - Omaha College Democrats Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/06/26/the-supreme-courts-definition-of-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-125164</link>
		<dc:creator>2007 - A Year In Review at U. of Nebraska - Omaha College Democrats Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/06/26/the-supreme-courts-definition-of-free-speech/#comment-125164</guid>
		<description>[...] 26: Bong Hits 4 Jesus! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 26: Bong Hits 4 Jesus! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Ambas</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/06/26/the-supreme-courts-definition-of-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-76290</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Ambas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/06/26/the-supreme-courts-definition-of-free-speech/#comment-76290</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t agree with this at all, the final sentence states the it goes to the censor not the speaker? well, its sounds to me of more a gray area more so than a black and white, the first amendment should be used at all times. no questions asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t agree with this at all, the final sentence states the it goes to the censor not the speaker? well, its sounds to me of more a gray area more so than a black and white, the first amendment should be used at all times. no questions asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

