<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adrian Smith Showing Weakness</title>
	<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48688</link>
		<author>dave</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48688</guid>
					<description>Well, it's $94K CoH, technically. I imagine his staff from the campaign is going to want their bonuses soon enough, though. Still, Kleeb is in a remarkably strong position against Smith despite not raising a dime in the past quarter. (In fact, he actually raised -$50, issuing a refund of a $50 contribution). 

I initially thought, after 2006, that Kleeb couldn't run for this seat again, that his best opportunity to beat Smith was in 2006. But I underestimated just how woefully bad of a Congressman Adrian Smith would be. 

Take a look at the skewed numbers - just how much money relative to individual contributions Adrian Smith is getting from PACs. 

From individuals: $26,661 (almost all of it from big checkwriters).
From PACs: $69,328

He got $2,000 from Nelnet (reward for a job well done?) and $5514 from the RNC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s $94K CoH, technically. I imagine his staff from the campaign is going to want their bonuses soon enough, though. Still, Kleeb is in a remarkably strong position against Smith despite not raising a dime in the past quarter. (In fact, he actually raised -$50, issuing a refund of a $50 contribution). </p>
<p>I initially thought, after 2006, that Kleeb couldn&#8217;t run for this seat again, that his best opportunity to beat Smith was in 2006. But I underestimated just how woefully bad of a Congressman Adrian Smith would be. </p>
<p>Take a look at the skewed numbers - just how much money relative to individual contributions Adrian Smith is getting from PACs. </p>
<p>From individuals: $26,661 (almost all of it from big checkwriters).<br />
From PACs: $69,328</p>
<p>He got $2,000 from Nelnet (reward for a job well done?) and $5514 from the RNC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48711</link>
		<author>dave</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48711</guid>
					<description>Oh, and here's a good catch Ryan made at the NNN...

The late, great Jim Exon has $113,911 cash-on-hand, more than Smith.

Looking through a few more reports, here's one that is just nuts:

Pete Ricketts has $7.6 &lt;b&gt;million&lt;/b&gt; in debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and here&#8217;s a good catch Ryan made at the NNN&#8230;</p>
<p>The late, great Jim Exon has $113,911 cash-on-hand, more than Smith.</p>
<p>Looking through a few more reports, here&#8217;s one that is just nuts:</p>
<p>Pete Ricketts has $7.6 <b>million</b> in debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48717</link>
		<author>john</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48717</guid>
					<description>the amazing thing as the regular media in Omaha doesn't do these stories or even check these facts.  

OWH... where art thou?  


College students blogging in our spare time figured out that Terry was running for reelection and not the senate before the OWH with it's two full time reports dedicated to this stuff and a staff of around 100.  

WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the amazing thing as the regular media in Omaha doesn&#8217;t do these stories or even check these facts.  </p>
<p>OWH&#8230; where art thou?  </p>
<p>College students blogging in our spare time figured out that Terry was running for reelection and not the senate before the OWH with it&#8217;s two full time reports dedicated to this stuff and a staff of around 100.  </p>
<p>WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48746</link>
		<author>dave</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48746</guid>
					<description>Smith Watch &lt;a href="http://nethirddistrict.blogspot.com/2007/04/first-quarter-campaign-fundraising.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;digs up a few more details&lt;/a&gt; from the reports... I've decided that we're all a bunch of nerds about this stuff. Which is all fine, because that just makes us good at what we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smith Watch <a href="http://nethirddistrict.blogspot.com/2007/04/first-quarter-campaign-fundraising.html" rel="nofollow">digs up a few more details</a> from the reports&#8230; I&#8217;ve decided that we&#8217;re all a bunch of nerds about this stuff. Which is all fine, because that just makes us good at what we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48940</link>
		<author>john</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2007/04/19/adrian-smith-showing-weakness/#comment-48940</guid>
					<description>I think ricketts has so much debt because it looked better for him to run his campaign into debt and then pay it off himself later on, than for him to write another 7 million dollar check to himself at the last minute (and thus generate more negative news stories about trying to buy the election) 

so that means Ricketts probably spent 7 million MORE dollars of his own money on his race than we all thought he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ricketts has so much debt because it looked better for him to run his campaign into debt and then pay it off himself later on, than for him to write another 7 million dollar check to himself at the last minute (and thus generate more negative news stories about trying to buy the election) </p>
<p>so that means Ricketts probably spent 7 million MORE dollars of his own money on his race than we all thought he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
