Comments on: 24 – Same Sex Benefits

By: Bortriys

Bortriys — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:40:03 +0000

Cute, very cute... Thanks man! anatrim information loss patch weight See you later, thanks

By: essie

essie — Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:00:13 +0000

So very cool format. Not everyone has to 100% agree. You made my day.Super fun website!.

By: Daniel O

Daniel O — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:47:28 +0000

Dave –
i am guessing that you don’t know where i stand on gay civil unions.

just think about it.

By: Theo

Theo — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:52:12 +0000

Watch the movie Time Changer and tell me what you think.

By: Dave Sund

Dave Sund — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:46:20 +0000

How is that even relevant? The First Amendment says that Congress (and by extension, according to court precedent, the government at any level), shall make no law establishing a religion. Now, you may not think that putting your religion in our schools is particularly exclusive to anyone. Saying that you’re justified in advocating the imposition of one narrow-minded groups goals on the entire population, based on the fact that most of us believe in God is incredibly bad logic.

I believe in God. But I don’t believe in a God that would condone the slaughter of innocents in the name of democracy. I don’t believe in a God that would punish people for how he made them. I don’t believe in a God that is a close friend of George W. Bush, Pat Robertson, James Dobson, and Jerry Falwell. My idea of God is far more just and loving than that.

By: Theo

Theo — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:04:03 +0000

So I suppose that says something?

Tell me Dave, do you pledge allegiance under God? or do you pledge allegiance?

By: Dave Sund

Dave Sund — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:56:25 +0000

Well, let’s see, since heterosexuals have the benefits of marriage and homosexuals don’t? Don’t even try to pull an equal protection card until you’re prepared to say that homosexuals have the same rights as anyone else in this country. Otherwise, you clearly have an agenda.

My “agenda,” if you want to call it that, is making sure that every American is protected by the Constitution, not just those who agree with narrowminded views.

By: Daniel O

Daniel O — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:45:56 +0000

Dave -
so you are saying you want two homosexuals, that are dating, to get benefits
and that heterosexuals, shouldn’t get the same benefits.
I don’t see how you are taking a fair and unbiased look at this problem.
It sounds more to me, like you are on an agenda.

Sometimes meeting halfway will take you twice as far.

By: Theo

Theo — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 04:49:01 +0000

I wasn’t trying to say that same sex benefits are pushing limits of freedom. I simply said many people take their freedom for granted. Same sex benefits are still a poor idea, and I guarantee they will not be implemented.

Oh…and homosexuals are dirty dirty sinners.

By: Dave Sund

Dave Sund — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 04:04:09 +0000

He doesn’t, of course, because there is no logical reason for such opposition. Even if he says that it’s against his religion, it’s still unconstitutional.