<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s in a name?</title>
	<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Michaela</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2919</link>
		<author>Michaela</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2919</guid>
					<description>The Democratic Party and their supporters are always thinking of new ways to bash a candidate in someway. They don’t represent their party very well. I would have a lot more respect for them and their party if they weren’t always trying to do a sly tactic to try to make the Republicans look bad. I have no problem with people who disagree with the Republicans, but if they disagreed by presenting facts in a professional and honest way maybe more people would take them more seriously and they would actually get more of their candidates into office. This time they had to lower themselves to a new low by buying campaign web addresses. Don’t they have better things to do? I guess not! 

Get with it Democrats and show some class!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party and their supporters are always thinking of new ways to bash a candidate in someway. They don’t represent their party very well. I would have a lot more respect for them and their party if they weren’t always trying to do a sly tactic to try to make the Republicans look bad. I have no problem with people who disagree with the Republicans, but if they disagreed by presenting facts in a professional and honest way maybe more people would take them more seriously and they would actually get more of their candidates into office. This time they had to lower themselves to a new low by buying campaign web addresses. Don’t they have better things to do? I guess not! </p>
<p>Get with it Democrats and show some class!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2920</link>
		<author>Scott</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2920</guid>
					<description>"I have no problem with people who disagree with the Republicans, but if they disagreed by presenting facts in a professional and honest way"

Well, if Ryan disagreed with Tony he can know post all the things his doesn't like about T.O. at www.tonyojeda.com.  Simple for people to remember and easy to find.  Makes it much easier for Ryan to get his views publicized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have no problem with people who disagree with the Republicans, but if they disagreed by presenting facts in a professional and honest way&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, if Ryan disagreed with Tony he can know post all the things his doesn&#8217;t like about T.O. at <a href="http://www.tonyojeda.com." rel="nofollow">www.tonyojeda.com.</a>  Simple for people to remember and easy to find.  Makes it much easier for Ryan to get his views publicized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2921</link>
		<author>Charles</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2921</guid>
					<description>Once again we see the deterioration and distancing of real ethics with that of political ethics. Just because someone has the right (legal or otherwise) to do something, does not mean that person should do that thing. 

This practice from either side is a negative ploy. Lip service can be given to the idea that one side can pose their own views on a person by using a doman that implies it is supported by that person, but the truth is the tactic is simply to prevent the otherside from having the domain, and possibly misleading those who search out information on that candidate. 

It doesn't matter if its done in politics, business or personal use, it is unethical to assume the identity of a person you are not affiliated with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again we see the deterioration and distancing of real ethics with that of political ethics. Just because someone has the right (legal or otherwise) to do something, does not mean that person should do that thing. </p>
<p>This practice from either side is a negative ploy. Lip service can be given to the idea that one side can pose their own views on a person by using a doman that implies it is supported by that person, but the truth is the tactic is simply to prevent the otherside from having the domain, and possibly misleading those who search out information on that candidate. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if its done in politics, business or personal use, it is unethical to assume the identity of a person you are not affiliated with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbey</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2922</link>
		<author>Abbey</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2922</guid>
					<description>Did someone call dibs? no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone call dibs? no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2923</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2923</guid>
					<description>Joe Says: 

August 28th, 2005 at 10:18 pm 
Hey real classy Ryan. Ryan you know as well as I do this nonesense has no place in politics. I hope you mature and grow up. Yet another tarnished reputation to the college dems at Uno. 

Joe Says: 

August 28th, 2005 at 10:29 pm 
Hey Gary do Nebraskans demand integrity when Ryan Renner does the stuff he does or is it just when a republican like Hergert messes up. Please explain this to big papa JOE cause I really don’t understand it.  ) 

Diane Hayes Says: 

August 28th, 2005 at 10:44 pm 
When republicans do this it’s saavy and smart politics. When democrats do it it’s underhanded.  

Joe Says: 

August 28th, 2005 at 10:57 pm 
Nice excuse Diane. You always find an excuse for all your great shananigans. Unfortuanetly it just keeps hurting your chances for people in Nebraska to take the democratic party seriously. Yup so keep it up and I can’t wait for your next excuse.  

Cody Says: 

August 28th, 2005 at 11:56 pm 
Joe-
If you serioulsy think that what Ryan did does not conform to the standards of the current political atmosphere, then you need a serious reality check. You’re from the same party who destroyed John McCain a few years back by telling all of the open-minded Republicans down south that he had a black baby. I don’t think that the Republicans can even mention integrity in political campaigns until they demonstrate a bit of it themselves. Additionally, there were several Republicans who mentioned that people from both sides do what Ryan did, so saying that it’s a ‘great shananigan’ is giving Ryan a bit too much credit. And finally, if it really is such a big deal as you make it seem, then I propose that your party is in a bit more trouble than you think. I can see the headlines already “Mild-Mannered West Point Alum Brings Down GOP”.

Congrats Ryan on yet another fine job. 

Cody 

Joe Says: 

August 29th, 2005 at 2:03 am 
Cody to buy out another persons campaign website is wrong. Republican or Democrat. I would and will say the same thing if a republican does it from cr’s. Bottom line is it’s wrong and should not be done. Don’t come back here with what republicans have done in the past and act like you are all high and mighty. Democrats have done just as much wrong things as republicans have done. I however am not one of those republicans who think that we as a party need to win by sneaky tricks and shananigans. Yet again you continue to embarrass and shame the only democrat in your state that is elected to NE delegation. There is a reason you do not win in this state you might want to explore some of those reasons. If you read in my above comments I give you a reason. Your views maybe popular in the university setting but there is a reason why John Kerry only won one county in Nebraska. And Connealy, Thompson and whoever was out in the 3rd district running against T.O. lost. And the same in 06 and in 08 etc. Start being smart and maybe you could make a difference in democratic politics in Nebraska I doubt it but maybe if you play your cards right and think how politics work out side your university you might help a democrat get elected Nebraska. On the other hand nah don’t listen to me keep on coming back with your pathetic excuses and keep getting beat year after year after year. Sounds good to me. Alright lets here the excuses form the democrats fly back at me. This should be good. 

Abbey Says: 

August 29th, 2005 at 10:40 am 
…what? Ryan did what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Says: </p>
<p>August 28th, 2005 at 10:18 pm<br />
Hey real classy Ryan. Ryan you know as well as I do this nonesense has no place in politics. I hope you mature and grow up. Yet another tarnished reputation to the college dems at Uno. </p>
<p>Joe Says: </p>
<p>August 28th, 2005 at 10:29 pm<br />
Hey Gary do Nebraskans demand integrity when Ryan Renner does the stuff he does or is it just when a republican like Hergert messes up. Please explain this to big papa JOE cause I really don’t understand it.  ) </p>
<p>Diane Hayes Says: </p>
<p>August 28th, 2005 at 10:44 pm<br />
When republicans do this it’s saavy and smart politics. When democrats do it it’s underhanded.  </p>
<p>Joe Says: </p>
<p>August 28th, 2005 at 10:57 pm<br />
Nice excuse Diane. You always find an excuse for all your great shananigans. Unfortuanetly it just keeps hurting your chances for people in Nebraska to take the democratic party seriously. Yup so keep it up and I can’t wait for your next excuse.  </p>
<p>Cody Says: </p>
<p>August 28th, 2005 at 11:56 pm<br />
Joe-<br />
If you serioulsy think that what Ryan did does not conform to the standards of the current political atmosphere, then you need a serious reality check. You’re from the same party who destroyed John McCain a few years back by telling all of the open-minded Republicans down south that he had a black baby. I don’t think that the Republicans can even mention integrity in political campaigns until they demonstrate a bit of it themselves. Additionally, there were several Republicans who mentioned that people from both sides do what Ryan did, so saying that it’s a ‘great shananigan’ is giving Ryan a bit too much credit. And finally, if it really is such a big deal as you make it seem, then I propose that your party is in a bit more trouble than you think. I can see the headlines already “Mild-Mannered West Point Alum Brings Down GOP”.</p>
<p>Congrats Ryan on yet another fine job. </p>
<p>Cody </p>
<p>Joe Says: </p>
<p>August 29th, 2005 at 2:03 am<br />
Cody to buy out another persons campaign website is wrong. Republican or Democrat. I would and will say the same thing if a republican does it from cr’s. Bottom line is it’s wrong and should not be done. Don’t come back here with what republicans have done in the past and act like you are all high and mighty. Democrats have done just as much wrong things as republicans have done. I however am not one of those republicans who think that we as a party need to win by sneaky tricks and shananigans. Yet again you continue to embarrass and shame the only democrat in your state that is elected to NE delegation. There is a reason you do not win in this state you might want to explore some of those reasons. If you read in my above comments I give you a reason. Your views maybe popular in the university setting but there is a reason why John Kerry only won one county in Nebraska. And Connealy, Thompson and whoever was out in the 3rd district running against T.O. lost. And the same in 06 and in 08 etc. Start being smart and maybe you could make a difference in democratic politics in Nebraska I doubt it but maybe if you play your cards right and think how politics work out side your university you might help a democrat get elected Nebraska. On the other hand nah don’t listen to me keep on coming back with your pathetic excuses and keep getting beat year after year after year. Sounds good to me. Alright lets here the excuses form the democrats fly back at me. This should be good. </p>
<p>Abbey Says: </p>
<p>August 29th, 2005 at 10:40 am<br />
…what? Ryan did what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2925</link>
		<author>Diane Hayes</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2925</guid>
					<description>Ya snooze, ya lose. Congratulations Ryan for being on the ball. Again, I'd offer to let Ojeda buy it back for a VERY hefty campaign donation to Hillary Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya snooze, ya lose. Congratulations Ryan for being on the ball. Again, I&#8217;d offer to let Ojeda buy it back for a VERY hefty campaign donation to Hillary Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kayla</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2926</link>
		<author>Kayla</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2926</guid>
					<description>I agree with Cody, and he just gave one example of the dirty tricks they have used.  I don't see how anyone can take an honest look at the Republican party and not see how underhanded and dishonest everything they do has and will continue to be.  I can't wait to see what they do to each other during their primaries in 2006.  That will be nothing compared to buying a few websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Cody, and he just gave one example of the dirty tricks they have used.  I don&#8217;t see how anyone can take an honest look at the Republican party and not see how underhanded and dishonest everything they do has and will continue to be.  I can&#8217;t wait to see what they do to each other during their primaries in 2006.  That will be nothing compared to buying a few websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad W</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2931</link>
		<author>Chad W</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2931</guid>
					<description>I am sorry, I think you should have taken the higher road. Tactics like this only makes the idiots on the right to justify their beliefs. And it certainly does not help in bringing others into a central mix. Name calling, childish tactics only makes people continue to hate the political forum. Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry, I think you should have taken the higher road. Tactics like this only makes the idiots on the right to justify their beliefs. And it certainly does not help in bringing others into a central mix. Name calling, childish tactics only makes people continue to hate the political forum. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michaela</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2932</link>
		<author>Michaela</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2932</guid>
					<description>This just shows us how low the Democrats do go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just shows us how low the Democrats do go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Michaelis</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2938</link>
		<author>Kyle Michaelis</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2938</guid>
					<description>Joe-

Could you be any more pathetic?  Look how even you recognize the Democratic Party's belief in free speech, yet rather than respecting that ideal you glefully use it as a weapon making mockery of everything this country is supposed to stand for.  Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter should be proud to have spawned so despicable a character.  I dare say you make this site, this state, and this country less by your presence.   

That isn't a call for censorship....it's calling a fool a fool.  So, post away.  We're all in on the joke, and it's you.

By the way, I disagree with the tactic inspiring this thread.  We can do better.  The fact that we even strive to do better is what separates us from the Joe-like Republicans of the world, who in this instance resemble drunken buffoons laughing at a member of AA who's fallen off the wagon but at least has the courage to try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe-</p>
<p>Could you be any more pathetic?  Look how even you recognize the Democratic Party&#8217;s belief in free speech, yet rather than respecting that ideal you glefully use it as a weapon making mockery of everything this country is supposed to stand for.  Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter should be proud to have spawned so despicable a character.  I dare say you make this site, this state, and this country less by your presence.   </p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t a call for censorship&#8230;.it&#8217;s calling a fool a fool.  So, post away.  We&#8217;re all in on the joke, and it&#8217;s you.</p>
<p>By the way, I disagree with the tactic inspiring this thread.  We can do better.  The fact that we even strive to do better is what separates us from the Joe-like Republicans of the world, who in this instance resemble drunken buffoons laughing at a member of AA who&#8217;s fallen off the wagon but at least has the courage to try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2951</link>
		<author>john</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2951</guid>
					<description>George Bush's campaign bought sites with the name kerry and edwards.  In fact, before edwards was announced as the vp candidate, every possible combination of "john" "kerry" "gephardt" "dick" "04" and "2004" was owened by the bush campaign.  That's a lot of names,  like 36 sites!  

And Kerry did the same to bush, but had less of a chance to because the Bush camp had bought most of them way before '04.  

It's a thing political campaigns do against each other, it's harmless and it's pretty funny.  Good job Ryan, way to make a big splash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush&#8217;s campaign bought sites with the name kerry and edwards.  In fact, before edwards was announced as the vp candidate, every possible combination of &#8220;john&#8221; &#8220;kerry&#8221; &#8220;gephardt&#8221; &#8220;dick&#8221; &#8220;04&#8243; and &#8220;2004&#8243; was owened by the bush campaign.  That&#8217;s a lot of names,  like 36 sites!  </p>
<p>And Kerry did the same to bush, but had less of a chance to because the Bush camp had bought most of them way before &#8216;04.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a thing political campaigns do against each other, it&#8217;s harmless and it&#8217;s pretty funny.  Good job Ryan, way to make a big splash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2954</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2954</guid>
					<description>Gimme proof john. Even if it's true doesn't make it right. If Bush did it then it's wrong but I want to see proof before I go and believe your gossip. I won't blindly follow your story if your going to say something like that you got to have proof. Show Big Papa Joe some facts John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gimme proof john. Even if it&#8217;s true doesn&#8217;t make it right. If Bush did it then it&#8217;s wrong but I want to see proof before I go and believe your gossip. I won&#8217;t blindly follow your story if your going to say something like that you got to have proof. Show Big Papa Joe some facts John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2956</link>
		<author>Cody</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2956</guid>
					<description>It's kinda ironic to hear a Republican say that he won't 'blindly follow'. I actually thought that was part of the party platform. Learn something everyday I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kinda ironic to hear a Republican say that he won&#8217;t &#8216;blindly follow&#8217;. I actually thought that was part of the party platform. Learn something everyday I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2958</link>
		<author>chris</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 02:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2958</guid>
					<description>Hey john, I saw your claim on the whole Bush buying websites out. I tried trying out a bunch of combinations of “john” “kerry” “gephardt” “dick” “04″ and “2004″ I also threw in "edwards" just to be cool.  I got nothing on the following 

www.kerryedwards.com
www.kerryedwards04.com
www.kerryedwards2004.com
www.kerrygephardt.com
www.kerrygephardt04.com
www.kerrygephardt2004.com
www.johndick.com
www.johndick04.com
www.johndick2004.com
www.kerrydick.com
www.kerrydick04.com
www.kerrydick2004.com

A couple godaddy's, most were error site does not exist, a book seller, a couple info sites. www.kerryedwards.com gave an e-mail address. Absolutely nothing remotely Republican or anti Kerry.

I also serched on Google for anything remotely close to "bush buys website" "republicans buy website" and found nothing on the subject.

If you would like to come back with documents on your claim, like an article from a newspaper or something like that, it would be really cool. I'd prefer something other than the ultra left salon.com type stuff, but if that is all you have, its alright.

You know us stupid Republicans, when a Democrat throws unsubstantiated crap at us, we like to throw it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey john, I saw your claim on the whole Bush buying websites out. I tried trying out a bunch of combinations of “john” “kerry” “gephardt” “dick” “04″ and “2004″ I also threw in &#8220;edwards&#8221; just to be cool.  I got nothing on the following </p>
<p><a href="http://www.kerryedwards.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerryedwards.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerryedwards04.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerryedwards04.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerryedwards2004.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerryedwards2004.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerrygephardt.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerrygephardt.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerrygephardt04.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerrygephardt04.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerrygephardt2004.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerrygephardt2004.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johndick.com" rel="nofollow">www.johndick.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johndick04.com" rel="nofollow">www.johndick04.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.johndick2004.com" rel="nofollow">www.johndick2004.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerrydick.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerrydick.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerrydick04.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerrydick04.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kerrydick2004.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerrydick2004.com</a></p>
<p>A couple godaddy&#8217;s, most were error site does not exist, a book seller, a couple info sites. <a href="http://www.kerryedwards.com" rel="nofollow">www.kerryedwards.com</a> gave an e-mail address. Absolutely nothing remotely Republican or anti Kerry.</p>
<p>I also serched on Google for anything remotely close to &#8220;bush buys website&#8221; &#8220;republicans buy website&#8221; and found nothing on the subject.</p>
<p>If you would like to come back with documents on your claim, like an article from a newspaper or something like that, it would be really cool. I&#8217;d prefer something other than the ultra left salon.com type stuff, but if that is all you have, its alright.</p>
<p>You know us stupid Republicans, when a Democrat throws unsubstantiated crap at us, we like to throw it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Di</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2970</link>
		<author>Gary Di</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2970</guid>
					<description>Please don't censor Papa Joe, his spelling errors are too much fun to read.  Besides, Republicans who openly foam at the mouth are more interesting than all those clowns who pretend to be moderate with mainstream Nebraskans and then rant in private to their true believers.  The tide will turn Papa Joe, and you'll be glad you can still find a place to vent on the UNO blog.  And Chris, it is not surprising that sites for 2004 candidates are no longer registered.  Dude, check it out, it's been 2005 for several months now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t censor Papa Joe, his spelling errors are too much fun to read.  Besides, Republicans who openly foam at the mouth are more interesting than all those clowns who pretend to be moderate with mainstream Nebraskans and then rant in private to their true believers.  The tide will turn Papa Joe, and you&#8217;ll be glad you can still find a place to vent on the UNO blog.  And Chris, it is not surprising that sites for 2004 candidates are no longer registered.  Dude, check it out, it&#8217;s been 2005 for several months now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2971</link>
		<author>Diane Hayes</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 04:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2971</guid>
					<description>Chris: Here's one you missed. 

http://www.whitehouse.org/index.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: Here&#8217;s one you missed. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.org/index.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.org/index.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2972</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 05:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2972</guid>
					<description>Diane I actually agree with you on something. Please show this site to as many people as possible. Post it up around school that the College dems support this website. Very classy stuff Diane. I really like the Jesus was a Pinko Commie. Keep up all the good work that the CD's are doing but promise me that you will show this site to as many people as possible. Big Papa Joe would appreciate that. Just as a reminder to everyone new to this blog we here at the College Dems support this website and would like you to visit this website you can find some very informative pro-American stuff on here. Visit please. http://www.whitehouse.org/index.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane I actually agree with you on something. Please show this site to as many people as possible. Post it up around school that the College dems support this website. Very classy stuff Diane. I really like the Jesus was a Pinko Commie. Keep up all the good work that the CD&#8217;s are doing but promise me that you will show this site to as many people as possible. Big Papa Joe would appreciate that. Just as a reminder to everyone new to this blog we here at the College Dems support this website and would like you to visit this website you can find some very informative pro-American stuff on here. Visit please. <a href="http://www.whitehouse.org/index.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.org/index.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2973</link>
		<author>Daniel</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 07:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2973</guid>
					<description>Right, if we are going to get to the bottom of it.
It doesn't matter what year it is, if they bought the site, august of last year, they should still have them. 
Careful careful 

Daniel "i call them as i see them" O'Mara</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, if we are going to get to the bottom of it.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter what year it is, if they bought the site, august of last year, they should still have them.<br />
Careful careful </p>
<p>Daniel &#8220;i call them as i see them&#8221; O&#8217;Mara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2983</link>
		<author>chris</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2983</guid>
					<description>Did you ever find any documentation on your claim that Bush bought out those websites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever find any documentation on your claim that Bush bought out those websites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2985</link>
		<author>Diane Hayes</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 21:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2985</guid>
					<description>Shrinky Dink et al: I love that site. Perhaps the reason you don't is because it's hittin a little too close to home. Your leader is failing (again.) You can be as smug as you want. Think our response would be different if we weren't talking poor and overwhelmingly black? Think it'd be different if we were talking about 80% of Palm Beach under water? I guess Rumsfield doesn't know anything about disaster relief and your "leader" isn't getting his required instruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shrinky Dink et al: I love that site. Perhaps the reason you don&#8217;t is because it&#8217;s hittin a little too close to home. Your leader is failing (again.) You can be as smug as you want. Think our response would be different if we weren&#8217;t talking poor and overwhelmingly black? Think it&#8217;d be different if we were talking about 80% of Palm Beach under water? I guess Rumsfield doesn&#8217;t know anything about disaster relief and your &#8220;leader&#8221; isn&#8217;t getting his required instruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2986</link>
		<author>Diane Hayes</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 21:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.unodemocrats.com/blog/2005/08/29/whats-in-a-name/#comment-2986</guid>
					<description>And by the way regarding Jesus was a pinko commie. Sorry this humor was waaaay over your head. It's called satire - humor based on truth. Jesus' teachings question war and senseless killing and I can assure you that someone would be painting his Christian philosophy as communist and posing the question, "Jesus: Why do you hate America?" Satire is tough for concrete thinkers to wrap their brains around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And by the way regarding Jesus was a pinko commie. Sorry this humor was waaaay over your head. It&#8217;s called satire - humor based on truth. Jesus&#8217; teachings question war and senseless killing and I can assure you that someone would be painting his Christian philosophy as communist and posing the question, &#8220;Jesus: Why do you hate America?&#8221; Satire is tough for concrete thinkers to wrap their brains around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
